THE CONSPIRACIES IN KUBRICK'S 'THE SHINING', AND 'ROOM 237':

Sorry for my lack of posts for the past few weeks, assignment deadlines at university were piling up, but now I'm on Easter break, meaning I have the time to write some posts on here.

Tonight I watched the documentary regarding Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece, The Shining, titled Room 237. Incase you're unaware of the documentary and the subject it explores, it deals with the numerous conspiracy theories and subjective interpretations of the 1980 film, giving close analysis of scenes in the film and using the social and historical context of Stanley Kubrick himself, and the time he grew up in, as reference for many of the points. The theories explored include the film being a portrayal of the rise of the white American and degrading/destruction of the Native Americans, a portrayal of the holocaust, a confession from Kubrick that he helped to create the 'fake' video of the 1969 moon landing and many more.

Through all 100 minutes of this documentary I was absolutely in awe. The detail that the critics speaking have gone into in their research of the theories is clear in their analysis of individual frames, set locations, and even the directors childhood, and gives a well-structured and interesting argument in trying to prove their case. The openness of the ending of the film is one of the things that makes all of the conspiracy theories key, with no clear message to guide the audience, the interpretation of the audience is something that Kubrick enjoyed, therefore I feel it is plausible that numerous hints of historical events and theories were put in the film in order to spark critic's interest, I believe that Kubrick would have been happy to watch this documentary, gaining an insight into just how effective his extremely detailed mise-en-scene and cinematography is in provoking thoughts.

The theory that has always interested me the most is the theory of Kubrick being involved in the faking of the 1969 moon landing footage. This footage has always intrigued me, as a child I thought it was incredible that I could witness, at my disposal, something that was recorded on a different planet (the moon isn't a planet, whatever, I was a kid.... OKAY?). As I grew older, started school and found ways to distract myself (watching documentary channels on repeat for days on end), I was interested in the faking of the footage because of numerous factors. Why is that flag blowing in the 'wind'? Why does the scenery look exactly like a part of Area 51? etc. etc.
This is going off on a most wonderful tangent, however, this is a film blog so I'll stick to Kubrick. I have explained one of the most solid theories of the faking of the moon-landing of '69 footage down below. The documentary explains it in much more detail, as you can expect, but anyway, enjoy.

THEORY: KUBRICK SUGGESTING HE WAS INVOLVED IN THE FORGING OF THE MOON-LANDING FOOTAGE.The pattern on the carpet that Danny rises from is shaped exactly like the launch pad for the space ships that sent astronauts to the moon. Danny steps up from this hexagon take off pad, wearing a jumper that has a picture of the Apollo 11 on it, physically showing the spaceship taking off from the launch pad.

Danny then walks to room number 237. Kubrick changed the number of the room from the original Stephen King novel from 231 to 237, claiming that the hotel they were filming in already had a room number 231, and the manager worried that nobody would want to stay in that room after the film was released, however it has been said that many people have rung up the hotel requesting said room, and it does not exist, suggesting Kubrick was covering this up. The relevance that the number 237 has to the moon-landing theory is that the moon is exactly 237,000 miles away from earth! Simple as that. Also, as said in the documentary, if you read the writing above the number 'ROOM No' the only capitalised letters are R O O M & N. The only two words you can make out of this are 'moon' and 'room', suggesting this is the 'moon room'. A confession from Stanley Kubrick of his involvement in the 'false' recording?