In this 1965 wonder, Jean-Luc Godard takes two of the most prominent actors of 1960s France, Jean-Paul Belmondo and Anna Karina, and throws them into his crazy diegesis in the heart of France. With the title literally translating to "Pete goes Mad", this film shows Pierrot, or Ferdinand, and Marianne fleeing from Paris after mixings with some Algerian gangsters goes sour.
In typical Godard style, we are led on a whirlwind road trip of violence, craziness and romance, with the relationship between the two being tested throughout and the threat of the gangsters who are after them always on the mind of both the characters and the audience.
One of the most notable features of the film, and the characters themselves, is that they are extremely self aware. With ironic references being made to the fact that they are performing as characters "It's not a film" and direct lines being spoken towards the audience at several points throughout the film, the audiences interests are heightened as this non-conventional characteristic is put to use. Although the aim of these references is not clear, there are features of the film that are more easily analysed, such as the characters whispering to each other inside the car, clearly devising a sort of plan that will get them their petrol free of charge, however this whispering is done out of the camera's 'earsight' and therefore the audience is put in a strange position, not in the position of the two main characters, or in the position of the unaware petrol station attendee, we are hanging in a limbo of knowing that something is going to happen, but not what, and it causes tension for the time that we are stuck in this limbo, showing the genius of Godard's filmmaking and the unique environment that the audience is thrust in to.
It is obvious that the film is aimed at cinema lovers such as Godard himself, with the film presenting a variety of themes and combining them into one extremely interesting narrative. Ranging from romance, to violence, to crime, to drama, this film takes the audience on a journey that is highly enjoyable and provides a range of emotions. The narrative is linear, however there is a voiceover of both Marianne and Pierrot that we hear several times throughout the film, where they seem to both be telling their story as the film progresses, as one would tell a story at a party, or over dinner, possibly relating back to the first scene where Pierrot is unwillingly at a party, having to mingle with socialites and filmmakers. This on-and-off narrative reads like a book, which is reflected in the amount of times quotes from literature are read and discussed, and shows Godard incorporating other arts into his work, with the addition of paintings and the mention of Van Gogh to the cuts to flashing neon signs, representing the coming of modern art, Godard shows that he is a man in love with the arts and that he is proud of it.
This film takes viewers on a gratifying adventure, with constant musings of existential topics, it gives the audience more to think about and discuss that simply the story of two lovers on the run, and the various layers of this film make it an extremely interesting watch. With an explosive ending, cinematography that makes you want to book the next one-way plane ticket to Nice and performances by Karina and Belmondo that drive the emotions deep into the audience's heart, this film is not one to pass up on watching, and for those who perhaps aren't highly aware of French cinema, is a beautiful film to start on.
Showing posts with label jean luc godard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jean luc godard. Show all posts
Sunday, 21 July 2013
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
A POST ON CHARACTER REGARDING JEAN LUC GODARD'S 'DÉTECTIVE':
If there ever was an example given that proves the old saying "too many cooks spoil the broth", it must be given in the form of looking at Jean-Luc Godard's 1985 film Détective. It sounds good on paper, a simple detective story with an integrated plot through different groups of people, hence me purchasing the film a mere week after watching Au Bout De Souffle (an example of an amazingly unique piece of art from JLG).
The reality is, this film sucked.
I got to about half way through the film, paused to take a sip of my drink, and in that second of drink-sipping, had a moment of clarity. I was 40 minutes into the film and had no idea what was going on. Well, I lie, I knew the basics, could distinguish between the different time periods, flashbacks and so on, however it was the lack of affection and connection with the characters that made me feel an almost distance between me and the film, almost that I felt like I couldn't watch the film due to not having the slightest clue about the character of anyone in the film.
One of my main pleasures in watching films is connecting to the characters. I think it's such a vital part of any film, and in this genre particular, detective films, half of the fun is playing the guessing game throughout the film of who killed who. It was simply impossible in this film to get any enjoyment from the (many) scenes where two characters discuss their lives and thoughts and the problem, in my opinion, is the sheer quantity of dry characters.
When comparing this film to Pedro Almodovar's Women on The Verge of a Nervous Breakdown, a film with many characters surrounding the central plot, we see just how much the development of characters contrasts. WOTVOANB is an amazing film to look at in terms of character development and control, with the characters lives capturing yours for the 85 minutes of the film (10 mins shorter that Détective, can I just point out).
This film was only just over an hour and a half long, and, although I state the character development is flawed, the film itself did not drag on at all. The framing of a lot of the shots were aesthetically pleasing, and let's be real, I have a weakness for the French language.. which counts as a legitimate reason, right?
All joking aside, the film paced itself decently, and I feel an extra ten, fifteen minutes at the start, introducing the audience to the characters in an engaging and natural way would have benefitted the film hugely, and changed my opinion on the film in general.
I'm not 100% sure whether JLG was given an embarrassingly bad script to work with, or if he made the decision for some obscure creative reason, but all in all, in my opinion the films big potential was definitely not achieved. I have a massive respect for JLG as a director, and in no way will this film be putting me off researching and watching more of his films, but hey, i'm just shooting themessenger auteur.
The reality is, this film sucked.
I got to about half way through the film, paused to take a sip of my drink, and in that second of drink-sipping, had a moment of clarity. I was 40 minutes into the film and had no idea what was going on. Well, I lie, I knew the basics, could distinguish between the different time periods, flashbacks and so on, however it was the lack of affection and connection with the characters that made me feel an almost distance between me and the film, almost that I felt like I couldn't watch the film due to not having the slightest clue about the character of anyone in the film.
One of my main pleasures in watching films is connecting to the characters. I think it's such a vital part of any film, and in this genre particular, detective films, half of the fun is playing the guessing game throughout the film of who killed who. It was simply impossible in this film to get any enjoyment from the (many) scenes where two characters discuss their lives and thoughts and the problem, in my opinion, is the sheer quantity of dry characters.
When comparing this film to Pedro Almodovar's Women on The Verge of a Nervous Breakdown, a film with many characters surrounding the central plot, we see just how much the development of characters contrasts. WOTVOANB is an amazing film to look at in terms of character development and control, with the characters lives capturing yours for the 85 minutes of the film (10 mins shorter that Détective, can I just point out).
![]() |
| Nathalie Baye, Johnny Hallyday & Jean-Luc Godard |
All joking aside, the film paced itself decently, and I feel an extra ten, fifteen minutes at the start, introducing the audience to the characters in an engaging and natural way would have benefitted the film hugely, and changed my opinion on the film in general.
I'm not 100% sure whether JLG was given an embarrassingly bad script to work with, or if he made the decision for some obscure creative reason, but all in all, in my opinion the films big potential was definitely not achieved. I have a massive respect for JLG as a director, and in no way will this film be putting me off researching and watching more of his films, but hey, i'm just shooting the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


